When I first started to watch this TED Talk, I couldn't help but agree with everything Susan Cain said. Reading is considered an introvert activity and is one of my favorite things to do as well, so I already started to relate myself to her. Then as she began to describe how she grew up, trying to prove that she was "bold and assertive" by going to crowded bars when she really just wanted to have a quiet dinner with friends, I almost felt like she was describing my life. Although I like to go out and explore interesting places, I would much rather stay in and have a relaxing night with a few close friends. I've never really considered myself an extreme introvert, but I've always known I'm not an extrovert.I chose this talk because I wanted to see a comparison between introverts and extroverts, and the title "The Power of Introverts" intrigued me. I know that I am more of an introvert than an extrovert, so I wanted to see what my "power" was. I also wanted to understand how this comparison of two different types of personalities could be applied to students in the classroom.
Cain gives an interesting talk focused on introverts in the world today. She said something in the beginning that really stood out to me: "Shyness is not introversion. Shyness is the fear of social judgment. Introversion is how some people respond to stimulation, including social stimulation." This stands out to me because I think that many people do not know the difference. These definitions can be beneficial to teachers. Instead of thinking a student is shy because they aren't raising their hand, it could be that they are just an introvert and don't feel the need to share their thoughts aloud. Many times teachers assume that students who don't participate in front of the class are not understanding the information. Although this is sometimes true, it is usually not the case. Some students simply just don't feel like sharing their thoughts in public. I know this because I tend to be this student in a crowded classroom. These introverted students are having a rough time in classrooms today because education systems are trying to gear learning towards more extroverted styles. They believe that extroversion is better for all students and that they can learn more, which is not necessarily true for school systems today.
I see this practice of trying to use a more extroverted style of learning in my classes this year. My physics lab is strictly group work with a bare minimum of individual work. Although this is an interesting style of learning and is beneficial at some times, every day of class is only focused on group work. Even quizzes are worked on together as a group. The individual time comes in when we complete our own test/quizzes, having to explain everything in our own words. And even though this seems individual, we discuss the answers within our group before we write, so everyone ends up having similar answers anyway.Although I enjoy this way of learning and it is a nice change of pace from the typical lecture format, working in a group has its pros and cons. I love being able to have discussions with my group and bounce ideas off one another. Two (or multiple) heads are better than one, so we can usually figure out an answer to a question better together rather than by ourselves. On the other hand, solitude is important as well. Cain states that "Solitude is a crucial ingredient to creativity." She also makes the point that when in a group of people, we tend to mimic each other's opinions, especially the most dominant person in the group. I see this frequently in my physics group, so I can't help but to agree. I enjoy working in this group, but sometimes a little solitude would be helpful as well, especially when forming your own opinions about experiments.